Counteroffer: a definition
A counteroffer (العرض المضاد), also written counter offer, is what an employer puts to an employee who has announced their resignation, in order to persuade them to stay. It can take the form of a pay rise, a promotion or a change in the employee’s role.
Two features of that definition shape everything that follows. The first is timing: a counteroffer comes after the resignation has been announced, not before it. The second is purpose: it is made to change a decision that the employee has already taken and stated. A pay rise, a promotion and a change of role can each be granted at any point in a working life. What makes any one of them a counteroffer is that it answers a resignation.
Why a counteroffer is made
The immediate motive is practical. A departure means a vacancy to fill, knowledge that leaves with the person, and a piece of work that can stop until someone else takes it on. The cost of all three is present today, while the cost of keeping the employee is spread over the months that follow.
That difference in timing explains the pull of a counteroffer. The cost of the departure arrives at once: the vacancy opens on a known date, and the knowledge the employee holds leaves with them on that date. The cost of retention arrives month by month. At the moment of the decision, then, the first cost is visible in full, and the second is seen one month at a time.
A counteroffer is also drafted in the short window between the announcement of the resignation and the employee’s departure, and that window is not a setting in which a considered decision on pay is made. Within the window, the question in front of the organisation is narrower: what it would take for this one person to stay.
What a counteroffer reveals about the organisation
A counteroffer says something the organisation did not intend to say: that the rise was possible before the resignation and was not granted. The employee may draw that conclusion, and so may their colleagues if they learn of the offer. Resignation then becomes a known route to having pay reviewed.
The effect on colleagues reaches further than the case that created it. Colleagues who learn of the counteroffer may take from it a lesson about how pay is reviewed in the organisation, and that lesson applies to them as much as to the employee who resigned. A decision taken to keep one person can therefore change what others expect when they ask for their own pay to be reviewed.
Why a counteroffer is not enough
A counteroffer addresses the stated reason alone, and the stated reason may not be the whole reason. Pay is easier to state than other reasons: it is a figure that can be named without accusing anyone. Naming the manager, the absence of a career path or the workload weighs more heavily on the person who says it.
If the real motive lies among those other reasons, the counteroffer deals with what was said and leaves what was not said untouched. It postpones the departure without preventing it.
The difference between the two kinds of reason is a difference in what it costs the employee to say them. A request about pay concerns a number, and a number can be discussed without blaming anyone. A complaint about a manager names a person, while complaints about the absence of a path, or about the workload, raise a matter with the organisation. An employee deciding what to say at the point of resignation can therefore give the reason that costs least to state, and a counteroffer built on that reason meets the stated reason while the unstated one remains.
That is why the outcome is a postponement rather than a solution. The pay rise removes the reason that was given. Whatever the employee left unsaid is still there after the counteroffer has been accepted, and if it was what prompted the resignation, it can prompt the next one.
When a counteroffer is justified
- A critical role with no replacement. When the employee holds a critical role and there is no ready replacement, the counteroffer is openly buying time, not a solution.
- A real fault that can be fixed. When the conversation brings to light a genuine fault that can be remedied, of which pay is a part but not the whole.
- Pay that genuinely lags. When the employee’s pay genuinely lags behind that of their peers, which the compa ratio shows. In that case the remedy extends to those in the same position who have not resigned.
The alternative to a counteroffer
The arrangement that can spare an organisation the need for a counteroffer is to ask the questions before the resignation, not after it: a stay interview with employees who have no intention of leaving, and a periodic salary review that keeps ahead of the market rather than catching up with it.
Both parts move the same conversation to an earlier point. A stay interview asks an employee who is not leaving what would keep them, at a time when no resignation is on the table, so the reasons that are hard to state at the point of resignation can be raised while there is still room to act on them. A periodic salary review that keeps ahead of the market settles the question of pay before it becomes a reason to leave, so that a rise is granted on a schedule rather than in answer to a resignation.
An organisation that corrects late can pay more and gain less. It can pay more because the rise comes in the window before departure, where a considered decision on pay is not made. It can gain less because a counteroffer addresses only the stated reason, and the reasons left unstated remain in place after the employee has agreed to stay.
This is an explanation of the concept, not legal advice.
A standalone Saudi HR system
One employee file holding the contract, the documents and their expiry dates, the attendance record, leave, salary and end-of-service entitlements. End-of-service, overtime and leave-balance calculations are built into the system.
A standalone system on its own subscription. The connection to Qoyod Accounting is now available.